Dion Hinchcliffe's Web 2.0 Blog
Web 2.0 University

Blog Feed

Subscribe By E-Mail

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Web 2.0 Expo San Francisco 2008 Speaker

Enterprise 2.0 Conference 2008 Speaker

Web 2.0 Strategies 2008 Speaker

Dion's Facebook Status

    Recent Readers

    Web 2.0 Ajax SOA Power Panel

    Web 2.0, Ajax and SOA Power Panel with Dion Hinchcliffe and Jeremy Geelan
    Click above to watch a SYS-CON Power Panel discussion on Web 2.0, Ajax, and SOA with Dion Hinchcliffe, Jeremy Geelan, and other industry notables including SOA Web Services Journal Editor-in-Chief, Sean Rhody. Taped on Dec 7th, 2005 from the Reuter's TV studio in Times Square.

     

    Public Calendar

    Web 2.0 Predictions for 2008

    posted Wednesday, 2 January 2008

    It's the first work day of the new year and I thought I'd take some time to offer up my predictions for what will happen on the leading edge of the Internet this year.  2007 saw Web 2.0 -- defined here as the pervasive two-way Web used for social media, mashups, user-powered Web applications, and social networking -- go far more mainstream than it had in 2006.  Web 2.0 poster children like MySpace, Facebook, and YouTube pushed their way into the top 10 Web sites globally and stayed there for virtually all of 2007.  Fresh, new Internet startups were created by the hundreds (even thousands, if you count the innumerable garage and bedroom attempts) last year and that trend isn't going to stop any time soon and the reason is fairly obvious: The Web is simply the best place to create an incredibly scalable business for the least possible investment and effort. 

    However, that's not to say that it's easy to be successful online.  It's not, and the history of the Internet startup arena is littered with failures large and small, and many -- even most -- startups will inevitably succumb if they don't provide a fairly compelling offering to the users of the Web.  But fortunately for those that get the right mix of capabilities and user engagement in their online products, the upside can be nearly limitless.  This fundamental fact helped drive the whole conception of Web 2.0: A new set of models and patterns creating Web sites and applications that looked at the best practices that actually worked from the success stories of the early Web.  My point here is that the Web itself is in a state of perpetual evolution and we are all still learning a great deal all the time about what works and what doesn't and the industry tries innovative new ideas all the time.  In this way, 2008 will continue to be a fascinating year as we see what history's largest ever business laboratory and incubator will turn out for us.

    We are however assuredly seeing the maturation of the Web 2.0 industry, with many of the less successful online product plays falling by the wayside from first and second Web 2.0 wave as infamously tracked by Michael Arrington's Web 2.0 Deadpool, with only a few meteoric stars rising to the top.  The good news: That doesn't mean there won't be many exciting and innovative new things happening online this year, if you only know where to look.

    Here's my take on what we will see happen in 2008 in the Web 2.0 arena:

    Web 2.0 Predictions for 2008 

    • Open APIs finally go beyond free as successful business models emerge. Sites like Twitter are finding that their APIs get ten times the use of the site itself (Web 2.0 principle: A platform beats an application every time), but monetizing them is a challenge for all but a few major player such as Amazon.  While you can charge for each transaction across the API boundary, that isn't appropriate for many types of API uses.  Some have speculated that Twitter's API usage is making them the middle-man, like the cable companies are with broadband, but with no reasonable way to charge for API usage that typical users would accept.  Companies will continue to experiment with techniques such as injecting ads in the API data to requiring a small yearly fee to open an API for an individual user so they can use apps built for it. However, at least one major new API monetization model will emerge in 2008 that will prove to have long term legs.  My bet: The costs will increasingly be bundled into a Web 2.0 application's subscription fee or other business model, even if they use an API of the user's preference, such as Amazon's S3.  This would require billing support from API vendors to chargeback for excessive use by a customer but it would work.
    Business Models for Open APIs Will Begin To Get Resolved In 2008
    • Rich Internet Application (RIA) platforms such as Adobe AIR and Microsoft's Silverlight get major traction as the development of non-trivial Web applications in Ajax remains difficult and time-consuming.  While Ajax is made from 100% open Web standards, it was never explicitly designed for the job of creating rich user experiences and it's proven tough going for many companies trying to create next generation Web experiences in Ajax.  Adobe and Microsoft have been making enormous investments in browser plug-ins and supporting development tools that will change the way the Web will look in 2008 and beyond.  These two platforms will be huge successes this year, despite the many challenges that RIA platforms face such as supporting page view-based business models, analytics, accessibility, network effects, link structure, search engine optimzation (SEO) and more.
    • Google's product strategy begins to coalesce into a mostly coherent picture, though a few big pieces won't fit into the puzzle.  While appearing to overextend itself into everything from online office application, mobile phone platforms, energy, and health, some of it will begin to make sense as the missing pieces begin to emerge next year.  Look for a strategy that combines a long-term vision to integrate enormous user reach (online, mobile, SNS) as well as function (software apps and utility capabilities such as search and location) and business (advertising)  into an interlocking platform play of a scope and breadth that will, pound for pound, out maneuver the vast majority of their competition.  Disclaimer: I am a Google shareholder.
    • The Web 2.0 industry consolidates as it begins to mature.  This has been covered extensively on Mashable and John Battelle's 2008 prediction list so I don't need to repeat their outlooks, which I generally agree with.  Most startups, as in any generation, will fall by the wayside and a few major success stories will emerge.  Mergers and acquisitions will ensue. The next generation will begin, and so on.  The reality is that most new Web apps are still mostly Web 1.0.  We still have a long way to go before Web 2.0 design patterns are standard fare but Web 3.0 (whatever that turns out to be) will come upon us while that's still happening.  2008 will see a lot of old Web 2.0 faces be acquired or leave the scene entirely.
    • End-user mashups will be a reality but adoption will be slow for most of the year as users take time coming to grips with the possibilities and mindset.  A little while back I wrote a detailed list of reasons why end-user mashups wouldn't happen in a big way in 2007.  Since then, it looks like only a couple of those reasons will be addressed in 2008.  Despite this, we'll see mashup platforms being rolled out by IT departments and high-functioning businesses as a significantly better and cheaper way to solve many problems by remixing the immense pool of content and functionality on the Web and in our organizations.  The average user will need time for this potential to be appreciated and understood but we'll see the first significant creation of end-user assembled Web applications in 2008.
    • The Web widget format wars will ensue as Google Gadgets/OpenSocial takes on just about everyone else.  No one will win yet.  2007 was the year of the Do-It-Yourself era when it comes to users creating their own experiences out of the Web, often by just pulling off the parts of a Web site they liked and sharing it with others in their blogs and user profiles.  To embrace this demand, almost all major Web sites currently offer their sites in modular chunks known as widgets, or if you're Google or Microsoft, gadgets that their users can distribute.  However, like many aspects of Web 2.0, Web widgets are an emergent phenomenon with no large company or standards organization having created it up front with lots of engineering and funding.  As a result, there are many different ways to design and offer a Web widget with Google taking the clear lead at the moment with well over 30,000 different Gadgets currently being offered.  Throw in SNS widget/app platforms such as Facebook applications and OpenSocial and you have a recipe for fragmentation and an increasing to do list for Web sites which want to participate in what is a growing and often captive ecosystem of users controlled by each format's backer.  No consensus will be reached by the Web industry in 2008 but many solutions will be proposed, such as the W3C's Widget spec.
    • Page view "inventories" for online advertising continues to fall short of demand, even if an economic downturn takes place.  The well regarded McKinsey & Company predicted last year that advertising will actually have fairly significant growth challenges for the next five years from high demand and lack of maturity in the management of online advertising through traditional outlets.  My personal take: I've seen enough pent-up demand that I don't think even an economic downtown will noticeable affect the fortunes of online adveritising for the foreseeable future.
    • Web-based Software as a service (SaaS), aka Office 2.0, continues to encounter serious challenges but grows at a record pace anyway.  Offline access to applications and data remains one of the biggest challenges to true Web-based software, but Google Gears and offerings from firms like Etelos are offering more and more options to make Web apps work offline (albeit with reductions in functionality).  Other challenges include the cumulative drag of paying a periodic subscription fee for access to software as well security and overall capability.  Despite this, positive aspects of SaaS will continue to prevail and 2008 is looking to be the biggest SaaS year yet.
    • A wave of new killer mobile Web applications (and their startups) appear, spurred by the iPhone Software Development Kit (SDK) and ever more untethered workers.  Twitter was likely just the first in an era of fundamentally network-oriented applications with communications and collaboration at their design core.  The release of the iPhone last year proved that Web apps could be nearly as functional and pleasing as desktop apps.  The coming iPhone SDK, which will let anyone build iPhone software legally, will help usher in a new era of useful new consumer and business mobile applications, many which will sport Web 2.0 capabilities or even be fundamentally Web 2.0 based, such as route capturing software and automatic traffic tracking, particularly as more mobile devices add GPS capability in 2008.
    • The first Android-powered phones will fail to impress and a decent, though not spectacular, iPhone upgrade keeps Apple ahead of the industry.  Google's widely covered Android platform will experience the usual beta/1.0 issues, particularly since one company doesn't have control over the entire product development process of Android phones.  Expect a somewhat rocky second half of '08 for Android while Apple maintains its market lead with what is still the most Web-friendly communications device yet created by releasing a solid upgrade of the iPhone this year, perhaps even twice.  Mobile Web 2.0 apps will continue to get very popular in 2008.
    • Social media begins to grow up, leading to the first significant onset of Web 2.0 versions of talent agents, production companies, and other supply/demand enablers.  Blogs and other forms of social media such as backyard produced YouTube videos let anyone reach out to the entire audience of the Web at the cost of nothing more than a little bit of their time.  Despite the hugely democratizing effect this is having in the media world, the new online stars of the Web 2.0 still need professional help to maximize their opportunities and potential.  While this has been going on for a while with media companies cultivating paid bloggers and other forms of leveraging social media, expect that the social media phenomenon will being to create its own cottage industry of agents that can help the talented reach the Web mot effectively, for a cut of the action of course.  On the other side, production companies will form to give rising stars the resources they need to succeed.  We'll see a spate of new companies forming around this growing need in 2008, as traditional companies in this space continue to struggle with the medium.
    • Leading social networking sites MySpace and Facebook continue to maintain their traffic but struggle to ignite significant revenue growth. Facebook's widely covered struggles late last year with the business model of its Beacon product is somewhat indicative of the entire Web 2.0 era: Incredible levels of participation with serious challenges to leveraging said participation due to privacy, governance, ownership, copyright, and other issues.  Make no mistake, however, these issues will be solved given the massive global stake in a successful outcome but it'll take at least through 2008 to do it.
    • The Web moves into the living room as sites like Hulu and others make it practical and rewarding to participate on the Web using a large screen for entertainment.  Digital convergence in the main room of our homes has been in progress for a half-decade or more.  I'm a little reluctant to call it but I have definitely noticed a sharp uptick in the people I know starting to use the Web on the big screen.  New Web apps are emerging to make it popular and mainstream, and in 2008, will see the first big major uptake of Web usage -- with rich media apps in particular -- in our living rooms.
    • The first generation of pure Web 2.0 auteurs emerge, creating social media and user-centric online experiences that are highly imaginative and popular, but difficult to access for the non-digitally literate.  The first generation of users whose most formative years were primarily spent in the Web 2.0 era are beginning to reach the age where they will become significant creative forces in their own right.  As the Web has become easy enough for semi-technical people to create nearly any experience they wish, expect that a generation of youth who consider the Web as natural a medium as the air they breath will begin to generate not just content but the next aspects of the Web itself.  While we continue to hold up movie directors, authors, TV production firms, and commercial Internet companies as the creators of most of the common large-scale group experiences we have, expect that Web 2.0 will impose its egalitarian influences here as well.  I predict we'll see an initial handful of Web 2.0 auteurs emerge that will offer large-scale Web-based "experiences" that will not only redefine the notion of the Web site itself but will be widely used as well.   I also expect that many of them will come from developing nations or from other unexpected locations and less from the United States and Europe.
    • Update: Ownership of data contributed to Web 2.0 sites becomes a growing public relations issue, though the average user won't care much this year.  I added this because the growing brouhaha about Robert Scoble's blocked Facebook account reminded me that we'll continue see many sites attempt to control the data they receive from users in a very Web 1.0 way.  This is somewhat surprising given it's 2008 and we've learned these lessons in the industry the hard way already.  However, it's entirely correct that Web sites should maintain control over their valuable and hard to recreate data.  A good example is how YouTube jealously protects its videos and doesn't let you download them, only view them on the site or through the badge.  Yet the often contrarian nature of the Web sometimes requires the opposite of an action to get the desired effect.  In this case, it turns out that the more control you give up, the more value you tend to get back.  Sites that lock users in, prevent them from having the experiences they want, and exert excessive and unfair control, will lose in the end.  See DataPortability.org and the GraphSync project, which aims to enable the open movement of a user's social graph, as examples of where all this is headed. 

    Update: TechCrunch covers JP Morgan's bullish predictions for the Web business in 2008.


    Where do you think the Web will go in 2008? Please leave your take in comments below.

    links: del.icio.us    



    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    1. Mike@PartnerUp left...
    Wednesday, 2 January 2008 7:11 pm :: http://startup.partnerup.com/

    This is a really interesting post. I agree with a lot of your points, but I think that 2008 will bring more rapid monetization of social media sites, given the fact that advertisers are now really starting to get hooked on the targeting opportunities offered by online communities that just can't be matched by traditional media.

    Also, we just posted on our blog a look back at the web/tech M&A activity in 2007, which I think you'll find interesting. It's at: http://startup.partnerup.com/2008/01/02/2007-acquisitions-web-internet-tech nology


    2. John Larkin left...
    Thursday, 3 January 2008 2:42 pm :: http://blog.larkin.net.au/

    Regarding your final point on ownership of data Dion an interesting example was brought home to me as I reviewed WebNode http://www.webnode.com/en/ a few days back. It is an excellent, full featured web publishing tool rich in features. It is quite impressive. The site mentions that the service is entirely free with no strings attached on several different pages. I felt that there must be a catch.

    Indeed there is a catch. On the Terms and Conditions Page they state: "You acknowledge that by posting materials on the webnode site You grant to Us and Our licensors and assigns an irrevocable, perpetual, royalty free, worldwide licence to use the materials both within the webnode site and in any other manner." This is a concern, maybe not for me and perhaps not for my students but it would make others think twice before using this free service.


    3. Sandro Paganotti left...
    Friday, 4 January 2008 4:12 am :: http://www.railsonwave.com

    Personally I start thinking about what web 2.0 really means; aren't we just going to populate the web with personal contents that doesn't really help anyone ? Are we just going to feed Google (and other search engines) with almost useless material for the whole next year ? I want to believe in this user-generated content phenomen but after a year I'm starting to feel cynical.


    4. Silicon Valley left...
    Saturday, 5 January 2008 7:56 am :: http://web.doodlekit.com/

    It is interesting that Google allows downloading the videos but YouTube does not officially allow it. Yet they are in fact automatically being downloaded to the temporary internet files upon the initial viewing. If there is enough demand, Web 2.0 services will accommodate their users wishes to control their data. This trend will probably start among business users.


    5. gyuszi bacsi left...
    Sunday, 6 January 2008 8:54 am :: http://www.my-wage.com

    I think that google will overtake yahoo in 2008


    6. sethd32 left...
    Monday, 7 January 2008 10:51 am :: http://www.javasigns.com/

    Overtake Yahoo? What do you mean by that?


    7. Arne left...
    Monday, 7 January 2008 5:12 pm :: http://www.bembamedia.com

    Thanks for your predictions. I'm most interested in 'at least one major new API moneytization model will emerge in 2008 that will prove to have long term legs.' Feels like a clever bet to me.


    8. David Timar left...
    Wednesday, 9 January 2008 6:34 am

    Am I off-track in predicting that eventually when I would log into one of the social community sites that I am a member of, I would see ads that are truly relevant to me? If a music online community site knows my openID and the list of other community sites that I am a member of, they can build a nice query to put together a near dead-on tag cloud about me. This in turn, would not just show ads related to a music genre that I like (specified in my profile on this music community site), but an advertisement based on what my personality is, where I am right now, what music events I have visited, what mood I am in right now, etc. Personally, I would like that, since I would actually see an advertisement about something that REALLY interests me.

    With Google joining the Dataportability project, they will kick ass in providing such targeted advertisements, IF companies/service providers (advertisers) will spend time on tagging their product/service very specifically and in-depth. I see advertising companies specializing in offering 'AdWords advertisements tagging services', since not all companies will have time to properly tag everything they sell/offer.

    I hope Dataportability will bring about a proper categorization of the personal information that has been scattered around the web. It's one thing that data will be shared, but unless there are common names for attributes across the social community databases, it will be very hard to create such specific tag clouds about a person. If two music community sites have information about what music I like, but this information is available in two different fields (MusicTitle in one DB, and Title in the other DB), then creating a query to provide a third CD store site with merged information about what music I like, will be difficult. So in order to properly utilize data portability, naming conventions should be created and used. Or am I off-track with such assumptions?


    9. friarminor left...
    Friday, 11 January 2008 11:57 am :: http://eedious.blogspot.com

    2008 is going to be a massive year for technology and how it really integrates itself in people's lives. Don't get me wrong that it still hasn't the last few years but the difference was that during the years before, the people who are most affected by it are the techies or those who have some IT background or in the IT industry. But now, owing to the fact that still consumers or end-users remain as the measure of success, it seems that even end-users are given more and more control with what Enterprise and web 2.0 are churning out. And that will be the key to making the turn around the bend to a fully embraced and integrated IT and Web civilization.


    10. alex left...
    Saturday, 2 February 2008 2:58 pm :: http://www.recentnews.co.uk

    "I think that google will overtake yahoo in 2008" - i dont believe this. Google is innovative than Yahoo. Google all time come out something new.


    11. Sandy T Fox left...
    Thursday, 27 March 2008 9:23 am :: http://www.sandytfox.com

    Google overtake Yahoo!? Am I missing something or did that happen like years ago? I mean Yahoo is still doing well but they haven't been seen as the web leader since 2000.


    12. Ravi Govil left...
    Thursday, 3 April 2008 7:07 pm :: http://kmlearning.blogspot.com

    I do not get the discussion on yahoo vs google. Is it worth debating? I personally agree with Dion's points. I think web 2.0 is going to stay and mature this year, will remove any doubt in minds that it is buzz and can burst anytime. I also think web 2.0 applications will look at monetizing their apps as much possible in this year.


    13. siteler left...
    Friday, 4 April 2008 5:43 pm :: http://www.siteleronline.com

    Who care web 2.0 we are waiting for web 3.0 ;)


    14. sohbet left...
    Tuesday, 29 April 2008 11:23 pm :: http://www.idealsohbet.com

    Thanks for your predictions. I'm most interested in 'at least one major new API moneytization model will emerge in 2008 that will prove to have long term legs.' Feels like a clever bet to me.


    15. Ismail Shihadi left...
    Thursday, 1 May 2008 4:35 pm :: http://www.uaerush.com

    The one agree the most is that facebook and myspace will struggle to keep their traffic, and i guess that facebook will have a much harder time doing this because of its sudden growth


    16. Ismail Shihadi left...
    Thursday, 1 May 2008 4:37 pm :: http://www.uaerush.com

    I mostly agree with the facebook myspace struggle to keep the traffic they're getting, especially facebook because of their sudden growth


    17. Sohbet left...
    Monday, 5 May 2008 4:31 pm :: http://www.asgum.net

    Thanks for your predictions. I'm most interested in 'at least one major new API moneytization model will emerge in 2008 that will prove to have long term legs.' Feels like a clever bet to me.